Last updated: February 19. 2013 10:53PM - 127 Views

Story Tools:

Font Size:

Social Media:

Relaxing long-standing restrictions on cross-ownership of newspapers and broadcast outlets is a bad idea. Apparently, it cannot be said often enough.

The chairman of Federal Communications Commission was flirting with a quick, quiet vote to undo a 37-year-old rule that prevents newspapers, radio and TV stations from falling under one owner in the same market.

The FCC has tried before. The responses from the courts and members of Congress have been, appropriately so, an eye roll and a finger wag.

Rules to limit media cross-ownership are in place to protect the public's interest in vigorous journalism, independent voices and diverse ownership.

The smoke still billows off a November letter from Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., to FCC chairman Julius Genachowski. The senator was incensed by FCC chatter about liberating cross-ownership to end outdated prohibitions.

These rules were put in place and have remained in place because they support diversity, competition, and localism in the public interest, the senator wrote.

The FCC set aside plans for a vote, and said it will accept more public comment, and perhaps vote, in January.

The Seattle Times

All user comments are subject to our Terms of Service. Users may flag inappropriate comments.
comments powered by Disqus

Featured Businesses


Info Minute

Gas Prices

Wilkes-Barre Gas Prices provided by GasBuddy.com