MILWAUKEE — Nearly as many Americans die from guns as from car crashes each year. We know plenty about the second problem and far less about the first. A scarcity of research on how to prevent gun violence has left policymakers shooting in the dark as they craft gun control measures without much evidence of what works.
That could change with President Barack Obama's order Wednesday to ease research restrictions pushed through long ago by the gun lobby. The White House declared that a 1996 law banning use of money to advocate or promote gun control should not keep the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other federal agencies from doing any work on the topic.
Several experts say Congress will have to be on board before anything much changes.
How severely have the restrictions affected the CDC?
Its website's A-to-Z list of health topics does not include guns or firearms. Searching the site for guns brings up dozens of reports on nail gun and BB gun injuries.
The restrictions have done damage without a doubt and the CDC has been overly cautious about interpreting them, said Daniel Webster, director of the Center for Gun Policy and Research at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Many have called for a public health approach to gun violence similar to what has been applied to road accidents.
However, while much is known about vehicles and victims in crashes, similar details are lacking about gun violence.
•How many people own guns in various cities and what types.
•What states have the highest proportion of gun ownership.
•Whether gun ownership correlates with homicide rates in a city.
•What factors contribute to mass shootings such as the Newtown, Conn., one that killed 26 people at a school.
If an airplane crashed today with 20 children and 6 adults there would be a full-scale investigation of the causes and it would be linked to previous research, said Dr. Stephen Hargarten, director of the Injury Research Center at the Medical College of Wisconsin. There's no such system that's comparable to that for gun violence, he said.
One reason is changes pushed by the National Rifle Association and its allies in 1996, a few years after a major study showed that people who lived in homes with guns were more likely to be homicide or suicide victims. A rule tacked onto appropriations for the Department of Health and Human Services barred use of funds for the advocacy or promotion of gun control.
NRA officials did not respond to requests for comment. A statement Wednesday said the group has led efforts to promote safety and responsible gun ownership and that attacking firearms is not the answer. It said nothing about research.