Sunday, July 13, 2014





Frank Schleck given 1-year doping sentence


February 20. 2013 4:16AM
Story Tools
PrintPrint | E-MailEMail | SaveSave | Hear Generate QR Code QR
Send to Kindle


BRUSSELS (AP) — Luxembourg's anti-doping authorities suspended cyclist Frank Schleck until July 14 after he tested positive for a banned substance during last year's Tour de France.


Luxembourg Anti-Doping Agency president Robert Schuler said that the RadioShack Nissan Trek leader was given a 12-month suspension backdated to last year's Tour, where he tested positive for the diuretic Xipamide. He has denied any wrongdoing.


The 32-year-old Schleck placed third in the 2011 Tour de France and was in 12th place overall behind leader Bradley Wiggins when he stepped out of the race July 17, five stages from the end.


Schleck will miss this year's Tour under the current suspension.


Wednesday's decision was the biggest doping ruling in the sport since Lance Armstrong admitted earlier this month he doped on his way to seven Tour de France victories.


Schleck was facing up to a two-year suspension. He can appeal to the Lausanne-based Court of Arbitration for Sport.


Frank and brother Andy have been Luxembourg's most popular cyclists over the past decade. Andy Schleck was awarded the 2010 Tour victory after Alberto Contador was stripped of the title because of a doping violation.


Frank won Alpine stages in the 2006 and 2009 Tours, and he also won the Amstel Gold Race one-day classic in 2006.


The International Cycling Union said the diuretic Xipamide turned up in a test conducted by the French anti-doping lab on a sample from Schleck taken on July 14, 2012.


The case at the time cast more doubt on cycling's ability to root out drug cheats despite vigorous controls put in place by the UCI and its allies. The diuretic is classified as a specified substance and does not require a provisional suspension. The World Anti-Doping Agency defines specified substances as those that are more susceptible to a credible, non-doping explanation. Bans for such substances are often shorter, and athletes have a better chance of proving that they did not intend to consume it or enhance their performance.




Comments
comments powered by Disqus Commenting Guidelines
Poll
Mortgage Minute


Search for New & Used Cars

Make 
Model
 
Used New All
 

Search Times Leader Classifieds to find just the home you want!

Search Times Leader Classifieds to find just what you need!

Search Pet Classifieds
Dogs Cats Other Animals



Social Media/RSS
Times Leader on Twitter
Times Leader on Youtube
Times Leader on Google+
The Times Leader on Tumblr
The Times Leader on Pinterest
Times Leader RSS Feeds