FRI

High:40 Low:29

40°

29°

SAT

High:31 Low:16

31°

16°

SUN

High:29 Low:18

29°

18°

Subscribe to the Wilkes-Barre Times Leader
Wilkes-Barre, Scranton and NEPA Garage SalesWilkes-Barre, Scranton and NEPA JobsWilkes-Barre, Scranton and NEPA Cars for SaleWilkes-Barre, Scranton and NEPA Homes
Times Leader FacebookTimes Leader TwitterTimes Leader YoutubeTimes Leader RSS Feeds
View Story As PDFView story as PDF
March 6, 2008

State bills address flood and stormwater damage prevention

One would allow counties to create watershed-based management plans.

While recent heavy rains have brought stormwater damage worries to the forefront, several property-owner-funded proposals for flood prevention are wending their way through Harrisburg.

The most recent -- introduced last week – is House Bill 2266, which would allow counties to create watershed-based stormwater management plans and authorities to oversee those plans. The authority could create funding by levying fees on property owners and users of authority services.

“Stormwater management is a really important and timely issue, especially considering the weather this week,” state Rep. Mike Carroll, D-Avoca, said. He noted he has not yet formed an opinion on HB 2266, adding that management needs “to be more careful and more streamlined.”

State Rep. Karen Boback, R-Harveys Lake, said she will consult with constituents on HB 2266.

The idea’s good, but the funding is “controversial,” state Rep. Eddie Pashinski, D-Wilkes-Barre, said.

State Rep. Phyllis Mundy, D-Kingston, said it’s helpful to streamline the process but funding is the first concern.

“The bottom line is once you do the plan you have to fund the plan. … And if you don’t, the plan’s outdated in a year or two because you’ve got new development and new runoff,” she said. “I feel as if this bill, a standalone bill like this that isn’t in conjunction with (a funding bill), is pointless.”

Enter House Bill 1989, introduced last year by state Rep. Jim Wansacz, D-Old Forge, and co-sponsored by all six Luzerne County legislators. The bill would levy annually a $1 surcharge on property insurance policies to create a fund for flood-prevention projects and to repair flood-damaged property.

Mundy said it’s reasonable because “we’re all downstream of somebody. People who were never flooded before (are now being) flooded. … You’re next, I guess, unless you live on Pringle Hill.”

Pashinski said funding isn’t to protect development in flood-prone areas, but for those whose property has become a flood plain because of upstream development.

“Do I think we should pay for people’s mistakes? No, I don’t. But I also think that … unfortunately, there are times where, just out of the sake of humanity, you help people out,” he said.

The bill is similar to a proposal called Rebuild Pennsylvania in the governor’s budget. It calls for a levy of .07 percent assessment on property-insurance premiums to fund a flood-prevention program.

State representatives John Yudichak, D-Nanticoke, and Todd Eachus, D-Butler Township, could not be reached for comment at press time.

WHAT’S NEXT?

A public hearing on House Bill 1989 will be held at 10 a.m. today at City Hall, Scranton.

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.








Times Leader Commenting Guidelines
Thursday March 06, 2008, 12:00:00 EST


The Times Leader Directory



Find Local Restaurants, Shopping & Businesses


Place Quick Ads