THU

70°

50°

FRI

68°

47°

SAT

76°

56°



February 2

Jury set for woman accused of piercing kittens

Holly Crawford of Ross Twp. allegedly planned to sell cats online as “gothic kittens.”

By Sheena Delazio sdelazio@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

WILKES-BARRE – A Luzerne County jury was selected Monday to hear the case of a woman accused of piercing the bodies of three stray kittens.

Holly Crawford, 35, of Dobson Road, Ross Township, will stand trial today on charges of cruelty to animals and criminal conspiracy before a jury of six men and eight women.

The jury was chosen Monday before Luzerne County Judge Tina Polachek Gartley.

Prosecutors say Crawford was charged after humane officers and state police searched Crawford’s home on Dec. 17, 2008 and seized three kittens with ear, neck and tail piercings. At least one of the kittens had a ring on its tail used to prevent blood flow, causing the tail to fall off in time.

On Monday, Crawford’s attorneys, John Pike and Robert Buttner, asked that charges be dismissed against their client because there is no evidence Crawford acted “wantonly and maliciously” and that prosecutors did not show enough evidence at a February hearing to prove Crawford treated the kittens in a way that abuses or neglects them.

“Why is it a crime to pierce a cat’s ears?” Pike asked Monday.

Luzerne County Assistant District Attorney Alexis Falvello said this case isn’t about beauty or ugliness, it’s about the tails of cats being killed so they can fall off and that the kittens cried when they were pierced.

Falvello said some of the kittens even suffered from infections because of the piercings and that Crawford admittedly didn’t take the animals to a veterinarian.

Polachek Gartley denied the motion to dismiss charges against Crawford and began jury selection Monday afternoon. In April, Crawford pleaded not guilty after waiving an arraignment through her previous attorney, Demetrius Fannick.

Deputy District Attorney David Pedri said recently that the three kittens were pierced a total of 10 times.

Kay Duffy, an attorney with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, also known as PETA, based in Washington, D.C., was present Monday and is expected to testify within the next few days.

Crawford allegedly pierced the ears and necks of the 2-month-old kittens and tried to sell them on the Internet as “gothic kittens.” In an interview with The Associated Press a year ago, Crawford said she didn’t think there was a difference between piercing a cat or a human.

“When I did it, it wasn’t with any cruel intentions,” said Crawford. “They were definitely loved, well fed, no fleas, clipped nails. And they were happy.”

Crawford said in the interview that she used surgical soup and sterile needles and that she checked the kittens throughout the day to make sure they were healing.

Similar charges against Crawford’s boyfriend, William Blansett, 37, of Sweet Valley, were withdrawn by the Luzerne County District Attorney’s Office in February.

Sheena Delazio, a staff writer, may be reached at 829-7235.

Send Question/Comment to the Publisher
Note: This will not appear in the "comments" section. Please see below to post a comment to the story

9 COMMENTS

sunny said...

Please punish this freak with the only punishment that will mean anything...a huge fine payable to the SPCA. I would be interested to know her education, employment, history that leads to such stupidity and ridiculousness. I could see an 18 yr old making a dumb choice, but 35?

February 2, 2010 at 7:44 AM

Joie said...

To John Pike: Why is it a crime to pierce kittens' ears??? You're a Pig, Pike. Rot in hell. To Crawford: There' not a hot enough place in hell for you!!! I hope Judge Gartley gives her the maximum sentence. People who prey on animals should serve harsh sentences. How dare you hurt God's creatures???

February 2, 2010 at 8:55 AM

Juan Gomez said...

If they convict this woman, they should prosecute all people who de-claw cats,cut tails off dogs and women who pierce young girls ears for earings.

February 2, 2010 at 1:11 PM

Amanda Levanda said...

She better get more than a slap on the wrist.. I don't see why just because they are animals it's for some reason not a problem...I can't believe how anyone could find inflicting unnecessary pain on an animal cute. It's just sick. People will continue to do things like this as long as others get away easy. There needs to be strict punishment for these people.. simple fines and probation just isn't enough.

February 2, 2010 at 2:38 PM

St. Francis of Assisi said...

Kittens have no defense, neither does she! These young helpless innocents suffered a life threatening painful ordeal, leaving them permanently maimed by her intentional cruelty. Given her callous lack of repentance, let her now suffer the full legal consequence for her crime.

February 2, 2010 at 3:55 PM

Al said...

Plenty of animal breeders purposely remove the tail from certain breeds of dogs. Where's the outcry for them to burn in hell or pay huge fines?

February 2, 2010 at 4:31 PM

Rupert said...

I agree with Sunny. This woman should have to pay a large fine. There is no way she did not know this was wrong.

February 3, 2010 at 1:00 PM

Calli Arcale said...

Al: why is it okay to dock some dogs tails but not to do this? I have my own feelings on docking, but even setting aside that, there are right and wrong ways to do it. The amputation should be done under some form of anesthesia, by a qualified veterinarian, in a surgical suite with infection controls in place. Wrong ways: the old-fashioned tourniquet method (which is what this gal was using on her kittens), scissors, hatchet. She should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Even ignoring whether or not it's even right to modify your pets, she was doing it in a patently cruel manner.

February 4, 2010 at 3:29 PM

Jeff said...

I have a problem with what she did, but I'm not sure that piercing a cat's ears, in itself, is a crime. It is hard to make a case that it is "animal cruelty" to do anything to an animal that would be perfectly legal if it was done to an infant human. I have a problem with people who pierce the ears of infants and toddlers, too, but I recognize that it is not a crime, it is just really stupid and cruel.

February 4, 2010 at 5:35 PM



BooCoo Auctions