Hi:

Lo:

MON

77°

54°

TUE

86°

58°

WED

81°

54°



May 21, 2009

Amesbury, Gartley, Hughes to square off for 2 judge posts in November

By Terrie Morgan-Besecker tmorgan@timesleader.com
Law & Order Reporter

WILKES-BARRE – In what might be deemed a judicial version of the battle of David and Goliath, Tina Polachek Gartley, a little-known attorney who spent less than $31,000 on her campaign, secured a spot in the November general election by placing second on Tuesday’s Democratic primary ballot, outdistancing several opponents who spent more than $100,000 each, according to unofficial results.

Loading...


click image to enlarge

William Amesbury enters a party in his honor at the Barney Inn in Wilkes-Barre, flanked by his children Will, 14, and Liz, 19. His wife Karen is behind him.

Aimee Dilger/The Times Leader

click image to enlarge

Additional Photos Below

But voters didn’t totally overlook the bigger spenders as William Amesbury, who spent $137,350 and Richard Hughes, who spent $100,587, won spots as well – Amesbury as the top voter-getter on the Democratic side and Hughes on the Republican ballot. Amesbury also secured a spot on the Republican ballot by placing second behind Hughes.

The two top vote-getters on each ballot go on to the November general election. The results set up a three-way battle for two open seats, with Amesbury having an edge as he will appear on both party ballots.

Amesbury won the Democratic nomination with 10,388 votes, compared to Gartley’s 8,246. Incumbent judge Joseph Musto came in third with 7,642 votes. On the Republican ballot, Hughes won with 4,845 votes, with Amesbury finishing a close second with 4,699.

The winners were among 17 candidates vying for the seats. Results are not official until they are certified by the county board of elections.

Gartley, 42, of Plains Township, admitted she was shocked by her victory as a tight budget limited the amount her advertising.

“I hoped my message would get through, but when you see $300,000 being spent, it’s very intimidating. I never back down from a challenge. I get more riled up,” she said.

Susan Kolesar, who helped coordinate Gartley’s campaign, said she also was concerned about the big spenders, but that worry began to wane several weeks ago as she and Gartley canvassed potential voters.

“As we went around the county I got a sense this was not going to be about the money. I can’t tell you what a relief that was,” Kolesar said. “This is a great day for this county. It proves that the political machine may have been dismantled.”

Gartley has dedicated much of her career to representing victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. She said she’s looking forward to the fall and the opportunity to secure a seat on the bench in the hope of restoring public trust in the wake of the corruption scandal involving former judges Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan.

Amesbury, 61, a popular district judge who has served South Wilkes-Barre since 2002, also had doubts that he could pull out a victory given the large field of candidates.

“Of course I was worried. Amesbury is not a political family name,” he said. “I think it was the diversity of my background that appealed to people. I’ve been a laborer, a teacher, a social worker, a lawyer. … Through all of this my experience was my message I brought. It appears that appealed to the Republican and Democrats in the county.”

Hughes, 48, of Mountain Top, was one of two registered Republicans who sought a judicial seat. Like Amesbury he had touted his extensive experience in civil and criminal law.

“I was running on my experience of 22 years of civil practice and years as an assistant district attorney. We got the message out. People who know me suggest I have the temperament to be a judge. Voters took a good hard look and gave me the votes.”

Musto said he was disappointed by the results, but pleased that all candidates ran a positive campaign.

Musto, who was appointed to the bench last year to fill the unexpired term of former Judge Michael Conahan, said he wasn’t sure whether being an incumbent hurt him.

“It’s possible, but I really can’t say. There are so many factors. There were some very good candidates.”

Send Question/Comment to the Publisher
Note: This will not appear in the "comments" section. Please see below to post a comment to the story

Additional Photos

click image to enlarge

Tina Gartley is surrounded by family and friends at the Polish American Club in Plains Township Tuesday night.

FRED ADAMS/FOR THE TIMES LEADER

click image to enlarge

Luzerne County Judge candidate Richard Hughes, right, reviews the voting returns with Hughes’ poll watcher Dennis Kijek at Hughes’ home in Glen Summit Springs, Mountain Top on Tuesday.

PETE G. WILCOX/THE TIMES LEADER

 

10 COMMENTS

Jeff said...

Musto said he was disappointed by the results, and said "he wasn’t sure whether being an incumbent hurt him." I think that the disgraced ex judges Ciavarella and Conahan hurt all of the honest people running for a judicial seat. Their corrupt actions have shaken the very walls of the dome. Luzerne County has had more than it's share of dirty dealing officials, but those two are the ultimate.

May 20, 2009 at 5:03 AM

Jack Stevens said...

Bill Amesbury will make a dedicated, honest judge for the county. Jack in FL

May 20, 2009 at 7:19 AM

H. Taylor said...

All three of the judicial candidates are excellent selections. The people of the county should be proud and can expect to be well served in the near future.

May 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM

Wake up said...

Said in the article: Gartley has dedicated much of her career to representing victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. Ask how many parents that have not had fair justice becuase lawyers use the PFA's (Protection from abuse) to there advantage. Question I have would you want to be in front of her as a male??? I believe she is not a person who would give fair verdicts becuase of her background. Please research all candidates before choosing.

May 20, 2009 at 12:44 PM

Happy..... said...

For once Great job Luzerne county!! Glad to see everyone feels the same about Menn!!! Thumbs up to the winners Congrats!!!

May 20, 2009 at 1:00 PM

Sal said...

I agree with Jack, Bill Amesbury is an honest, upright man. He will bring the judicial system in Luzerne County back to being a place where fair and just decisions are made.

May 20, 2009 at 6:08 PM

Scott said...

I never considered Musto as an option since he went back on his word regarding seeking re-election.

May 20, 2009 at 8:44 PM

Cynthia said...

Menn would have been a great judge. He will continue to serve and help those in need, as he always has. It is unfortunate that many do not know the kindness of this man.

May 21, 2009 at 12:44 PM

relic said...

never understood why Musto wasted the money, he can't hear criminial cases with musto-carroll as DA

May 22, 2009 at 9:48 AM

Barb said...

My daughter appeared before Bill Amesbury because she was being abused by a former boyfriend. She needed a protection from abuse order. I was very impressed with this man. He didn't treat her like the same ole, same ole. I am sure he saw many cases like hers many times before, but he treated her with respect and dignity and he acted right away to protect her from this man. It is now 4 yrs. later and he recognized my daughter outside of his office. Clearly he pays attention when he makes decisions. I think he will make a fine judge for our system. He will have my vote. Keep up the good work Mr. Amesbury. My first impression of you was right on. Good luck.

May 26, 2009 at 10:46 AM



BooCoo Auctions