Friday, July 11, 2014





Panowicz defense too late, prosecutor says


September 04. 2013 10:12AM
SHEENA DELAZIO sdelazio@timesleader.com


Keywords:  Panowicz

Related Stories:
Did judge make right call on Panowicz verdict?

Panowicz not guilty in 2008 hit-run

Judge: Panowicz not guilty in hit-and-run case

Panowicz hit-and-run-trial underway

Fatal hit-run defendant’s words read

Trial for 2008 fatal hit-and-run slated for Tuesday start

Tempers flare in advance of fatal hit-run trial

Trial for 2008 fatal hit-and-run case begins tomorrow

Ruling restricts mental health evidence from Panowicz in 2008 pedestrian fatal

Prosecutors blast insanity claim by Megan Panowicz in fatal hit-run

State seeks jury trial in ‘08 fatal hit-run


Story Tools
PrintPrint | E-MailEMail | SaveSave | Hear Generate QR Code QR
Send to Kindle


WILKES-BARRE – Megan Panowicz’s mental infirmity defense in the case of a hit-and-run that killed a woman in 2008 is several years too late, a prosecutor contended in legal papers.


The filing of court papers notifying a senior judge that defense attorneys seek to admit evidence that Panowicz, 28, suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder is also an attempt to delay of her Sept. 23 trial, Deputy Attorney General Clarke Madden said in court papers filed Tuesday.


Panowicz, of Forty Forty, is charged in the August 2008 death of Sharon Shaughnessy, who was killed on Wyoming Avenue in Kingston when she was reportedly struck by three vehicles.


Panowicz has a “longstanding disorder” that causes her to avoid stressful situations by “attempting to over self control,” her attorneys said in a filing last month.


Her attorneys, her father, Robert Panowicz, and Basil Russin, said they intend to call two doctors as well as Panowicz and her mother, Cheryl Panowicz, to prove the infirmity defense.


“The events which caused her to have post traumatic stress rendered her incapable of appreciating the significance or consequences of her behavior and affected her ability to determine what was right or wrong at that crucial moment,” the attorneys wrote.


Madden said in his filing that under state rules governing criminal procedures, Panowicz’s attorneys had a certain time frame after her arraignment in March 2009 to file the mental infirmity defense, but did not.


“The … notice (of the mental infirmity defense) is not weeks, months or seasons overdue; it is literally years past the deadline,” Madden wrote.


Madden wrote Panowicz has not attempted to “account for this hugely prejudicial delay” and has only done so by “gamesmanship.”


Madden asks that Panowicz be precluded from presenting the defense to a jury at her Sept. 23 trial.


Senior Judge Charles Brown has not yet scheduled a hearing on the matter, and will ultimately make a ruling.




Comments
comments powered by Disqus Commenting Guidelines
Poll
Mortgage Minute


Search for New & Used Cars

Make 
Model
 
Used New All
 

Search Times Leader Classifieds to find just the home you want!

Search Times Leader Classifieds to find just what you need!

Search Pet Classifieds
Dogs Cats Other Animals



Social Media/RSS
Times Leader on Twitter
Times Leader on Youtube
Times Leader on Google+
The Times Leader on Tumblr
The Times Leader on Pinterest
Times Leader RSS Feeds