Last updated: March 28. 2013 10:30PM - 603 Views

Story Tools:

Font Size:

Social Media:

From the moment it was conceived, the Defense of Marriage Act was indefensible. The Supreme Court should send it to the dustbin of history, where it belongs.


Fortunately, Wednesday’s deliberations seemed headed in that direction, although it’s unclear which legal trash chute the justices will choose. A majority of them expressed skepticism that DOMA passes constitutional muster. No surprise there. Judicial experts have been questioning its validity from the day President Bill Clinton signed it into law Sept. 21, 1996.


DOMA defines marriage as between a man and woman and denies legally married same-sex couples the rights and benefits available to other couples. Its elimination should please both social liberals and states-rights conservatives.


DOMA brought out the worst in Clinton, who caved on principle to shore up his bid for re-election. His Republican opponent, Sen. Bob Dole, had pushed DOMA as a wedge issue after a Hawaii court ruling paving the way toward gay marriage, throwing conservatives into a tizzy. Clinton’s advisers were running scared after the “don’t ask, don’t tell” fiasco for gays in the military and feared the president would lose votes if he stood up to Congress on DOMA.


Clinton reportedly regretted his decision from the moment he signed it. When the Supreme Court decided to take up this case, he wrote — in longhand — a column for the Washington Post saying “the law was discriminatory” and he wished he had not signed it.


The Supreme Court should put an end to an obviously discriminatory law.


San Jose Mercury News

Comments
comments powered by Disqus


Featured Businesses


Poll



Mortgage Minute