Sports

soccer commentary

DAVID CRARY AP National Writer

NEW YORK — The vicious hair-pulling of an opponent was inexcusable. But prominent advocates of women’s sports say that so, too, has been much of the commentary generated by the popular video of college soccer player Elizabeth Lambert’s combative tactics in a recent game.

“Catfight” has been a term commonly used in cyberspace reactions to the video clip now seen by millions of people around the world. One Web site ran a poll: “Do you find violent women sexy?” Some bloggers — lapsing into old stereotypes — suggested Lambert’s menstrual cycle was a factor.

“It’s clearly sexist,” said Terry O’Neill, president of the National Organization for Women, as she assessed the overall reaction to Lambert’s rough play in a Nov. 5 game between her New Mexico team and Brigham Young.

“There are still some people in this country who just can’t accept that women want to play sports, and sometime sports get rough.”

Lambert, a junior defender who was suspended indefinitely, issued an apology through the university, saying, “I let my emotions get the best of me in a heated situation.”

She was involved in several incidents of hard-nosed play during the Mountain West Conference tournament semifinal, mostly notably when she grabbed BYU’s Kassidy Shumway by her ponytail and yanked her backward to the ground.

Laura Pappano, co-author of a book about gender in sports and a writer-in-residence at Wellesley College, has written a couple of blogs assessing reactions to the Lambert video.

“The image of female athletes as more than skilled players — as good, wholesome people — is a centerpiece of women’s sports and a staple of marketing, promotion, and ticket-selling,” Pappano wrote. “This has been both a benefit and a limitation that has helped shape women’s sports as ’gentler’ fare.”

This feeds into a situation in which male athletes often get a pass for bad behavior, while women draw criticism, she argued.

“We forgive Michael Vick, and gasp when Serena Williams screams at a line judge’s late call at the U.S. Open,” Pappano wrote. “No one likes dirty play. But if Elizabeth Lambert just made people see that women’s sports intense, competitive, and exciting, good for her.”

Lambert herself, according to the New Mexico athletic department, is not giving further interviews at this stage beyond one she gave Tuesday to The New York Times in which she did suggest there is a double standard for women’s sports.

“I feel because I am a female it did bring about a lot more attention than if a male did it,” Lambert told the Times. “It’s more expected for men to … be rough.”

Blogger and author Michael Tunison was among the male commentators who didn’t fully buy that argument, saying Lambert brought the attention on herself because her conduct “was so brazenly outlandish.”