Wednesday, May 22, 2013





Appellate court to consider Calif. paparazzi law


Last Modified: March 16. 2013 9:22PM
Story Tools
PrintPrint | E-MailEMail | SaveSave | Hear Generate QR Code QR
Send to Kindle


697278ffc37e4c4fb0696d3c74318c8b.jpg



(AP) A judge has declined to reconsider his ruling dismissing charges filed under California's anti-paparazzi law, triggering a full appeal before a panel of judges who have indicated that they believe the law is constitutional.


Court records show Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Thomas Rubinson issued a notice on Monday declining to reconsider his decision to dismiss two charges against photographer Paul Raef.


Rubinson ruled last year that the charges filed over Raef's pursuit of shots of Justin Bieber were unconstitutional.


A three-judge appeals panel asked Rubinson to reconsider his ruling and indicated in a filing Jan. 28 that it believes the law is constitutional.


Raef's attorney David S. Kestenbaum had urged the judge to stick with his ruling.


City attorney's spokesman Frank Mateljan declined comment on Rubinson's decision.


Associated Press


Comments
Commenting Guidelines
Poll

Search for New & Used Cars

Make 
Model
 
Used New All
 

Search Times Leader Classifieds to find just the home you want!

Search Times Leader Classifieds to find just what you need!

Search Pet Classifieds
Dogs Cats Other Animals



Social Media/RSS
Times Leader on Twitter
Times Leader on Youtube
Times Leader on Google+
The Times Leader on Tumblr
The Times Leader on Pinterest
Times Leader RSS Feeds