Thursday, July 10, 2014

BCS Standings

February 19. 2013 3:44PM
Story Tools
PrintPrint | E-MailEMail | SaveSave | Hear Generate QR Code QR
Send to Kindle

BCS Standings

Nov. 4, 2012


USA Today Computer Computer

1. Alabama12867.9972114751.00001.9900.99571
2. Kansas St.32664.926631370.92883.9400.93182
3. Oregon22735.951321399.94855.8500.91664
4. Notre Dame42533.881041289.87392.9600.90503
5. Georgia52345.815751218.82586.8100.81716
6. Florida72154.749271091.73974.8700.78637
7. LSU82011.69959998.67667.7400.70545
8. South Carolina111654.575311880.59668.6900.62068
9. Louisville101825.634810940.637313.5400.604010
10. Florida St.62223.773261147.777619.2400.59699
11. Oregon St.121588.552312807.54718.6900.596511
12. Oklahoma131556.541213800.542410.6600.581212
13. Clemson91969.684981013.686816.3600.577213
14. Stanford141431.497715705.478012.5500.508614
15. Texas A&M151320.459114736.499011.5600.506016
16. Nebraska16992.345016513.347814.5000.397620
17. Texas17860.299117485.328815.4500.359323
18. UCLA21587.204219333.225817.3300.2533NR
19. Southern Cal18690.240022224.151923.1200.170617
20. Louisiana Tech19659.229218363.246130.0000.158425
21. Mississippi St.20603.209723186.126125.1000.145315
22. Texas Tech25203.07062768.046118.3100.142218
23. Rutgers22475.165220264.179028.0200.1214NR
24. Northwestern24259.090121234.158627.0400.0962NR
25. Toledo26160.055725108.073224.1100.0796NR

1. Alabama312111
2. Kansas St.223323
3. Oregon545574
4. Notre Dame131232
5. Georgia657656
6. Florida464445
7. LSU9711767
8. South Carolina8899910
9. Louisville10148152311
10. Florida St.18201525-17
11. Oregon St.710610108
12. Oklahoma12916889
13. Clemson16131423-15
14. Stanford111213121214
15. Texas A&M131610111113
16. Nebraska151712131412
17. Texas141118161316
18. UCLA17-17181818
19. Southern Cal-21-211924
20. Louisiana Tech-25----
21. Mississippi St.23-20242225
22. Texas Tech1915-191520
23. Rutgers24-21---
24. Northwestern21-22---
25. Toledo22-19--19

Explanation Key

The BCS Average is calculated by averaging the percent totals of the Harris Interactive, USA Today Coaches and Computer polls. Team percentages are derived by dividing a team's actual voting points by a maximum 2875 possible points in the Harris Interactive Poll and 1475 possible points in the USA Today Coaches Poll.

Six computer rankings are used to determine the overall computer component. The highest and lowest ranking for each team is dropped, and the remaining four are added and divided to produce a Computer Rankings Percentage. The six computer ranking providers are Anderson & Hester, Richard Billingsley, Colley Matrix, Kenneth Massey, Jeff Sagarin, and Peter Wolfe. Each computer ranking accounts for schedule strength in its formula.

comments powered by Disqus Commenting Guidelines
Mortgage Minute

Search for New & Used Cars

Used New All

Search Times Leader Classifieds to find just the home you want!

Search Times Leader Classifieds to find just what you need!

Search Pet Classifieds
Dogs Cats Other Animals

Social Media/RSS
Times Leader on Twitter
Times Leader on Youtube
Times Leader on Google+
The Times Leader on Tumblr
The Times Leader on Pinterest
Times Leader RSS Feeds