Saturday, July 12, 2014

Bill expands fertility coverage

February 16. 2013 5:32PM

Story Tools
PrintPrint | E-MailEMail | SaveSave | Hear Generate QR Code QR
Send to Kindle

WASHINGTON ‚?? The roadside bomb that exploded outside Andrew Robinson‚??s Humvee in Iraq six years ago broke the Marine staff sergeant‚??s neck and left him without use of his legs. It also cast doubt on his ability to father a child, a gnawing emotional wound for a then-23-year-old who had planned to start a family with his wife of less than two years.

The catastrophic spinal cord injury meant the couple‚??s best hope for children was in vitro fertilization, an expensive and time-consuming medical procedure whose cost isn‚??t covered by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Robinson and his wife were forced to pay out of pocket, with help from a doctor‚??s discount and drugs donated by other patients.

A bill being considered in the Senate would expand the VA‚??s medical benefits package so other veterans, and their spouses or surrogates, don‚??t have to bear the same expense. The department currently covers a range of medical treatment for veterans, including some infertility care, but the legislation specifically authorizes the VA to cover IVF and to pay for procedures now provided for some critically injured active-duty soldiers.

The bill‚??s meant to help wounded veterans start families as they return home from war and to address a harrowing consequence of combat that can radically change a couple‚??s marriage but receives less attention than post-traumatic stress disorder and brain injuries.

‚??It‚??s common sense: a male veteran cannot have a kid by himself. It doesn‚??t happen. They need obviously to have it with their wife or a partner,‚?Ě said Robinson, of Florence, N.J., who is now 29 and was injured in a 2006 explosion in Al Anbar province. ‚??So for the VA to say, ‚??Oh, we can only cover this part of it,‚?? it just kind of doesn‚??t make sense.‚?Ě

In vitro fertilization, the process of mixing sperm and eggs in a laboratory dish and transferring the resulting embryo into a woman‚??s uterus, costs thousands of dollars and each cycle can take weeks. It‚??s physically taxing too, requiring hormone injections and other invasive steps, and can take multiple tries to produce a viable pregnancy. For many wounded veterans, it represents the most promising option.

More than 1,830 veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have suffered pelvic fractures and genitourinary injuries since 2003 that could affect their abilities to reproduce, according to Pentagon figures provided to Sen. Patty Murray, the bill‚??s sponsor and chairwoman of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee.

‚??Because they served our country, they now can‚??t have a family, which is part of their dream,‚?Ě said the Washington state Democrat, who hopes the committee will act on the bill after returning from August recess. ‚??I think we now have a responsibility to not take that dream away.‚?Ě

Combat injuries can dampen a soldier‚??s ability to have children in any number of ways, said Mark Edney, a Maryland urologist and Army reservist who treats veterans. For men, a blast to the genitalia can harm sperm-producing testicles, while a spinal cord injury can cause erectile dysfunction or ejaculatory problems. For women, shrapnel can injure the pelvis and fallopian tubes, preventing fertilization.

comments powered by Disqus Commenting Guidelines
Mortgage Minute

Search for New & Used Cars

Used New All

Search Times Leader Classifieds to find just the home you want!

Search Times Leader Classifieds to find just what you need!

Search Pet Classifieds
Dogs Cats Other Animals

Social Media/RSS
Times Leader on Twitter
Times Leader on Youtube
Times Leader on Google+
The Times Leader on Tumblr
The Times Leader on Pinterest
Times Leader RSS Feeds