Wednesday, April 16, 2014





Foes in Jersey sports betting suit argue cases


February 19. 2013 10:38PM
Story Tools
PrintPrint | E-MailEMail | SaveSave | Hear Generate QR Code QR
Send to Kindle


TRENTON, N.J. — Pro sports leagues have experienced nearly unprecedented success despite the existence of illegal and legal gambling and therefore can't claim harm if New Jersey legalizes sports betting, an attorney for the state argued Tuesday.


There's no evidence that gambling has hurt the sports leagues and their reputation, said Theodore Olson, a former U.S. solicitor general who has joined the state's legal team. All evidence shows sports have grown in this country alongside the growth of gambling, some legal, some not legal. Illegal gambling on the Super Bowl has made the Super Bowl the most watched event on TV in the world.


U.S. District Judge Michael Shipp heard arguments Tuesday from both sides as he weighs whether to throw out the lawsuit by the NFL, NBA, NHL, Major League Baseball and the NCAA or to let it proceed to trial. After presentations lasting about 90 minutes from Olson and plaintiffs' attorney Jeffrey Mishkin, Shipp said he would issue a written ruling by Friday.


The leagues filed suit in August after Gov. Chris Christie vowed to defy a federal ban on sports wagering. New Jersey's Legislature enacted a sports betting law in January, limiting bets to the Atlantic City casinos and the state's horse racing tracks.


New Jersey has said it plans to license sports betting as soon as January, and in October published regulations governing licenses. But the state agreed to give the leagues 30 days' notice before it grants any licenses and hasn't done so yet, an attorney general's office spokesman said.


If Shipp sides with the state and dismisses the lawsuit, the leagues are expected to appeal immediately. The federal government also could join the case.


A 1990s federal law prohibited sports gambling in all states but Nevada, where bettors can gamble on single games, and three other states that were allowed to offer multi-game parlay betting. New Jersey has argued the law usurps the authority of state legislatures and discriminates by grandfathering in some states.


Tuesday's hearing revolved around whether the leagues and NCAA could show they would suffer harm from New Jersey's action, thereby giving them standing in court.


There will be greater suspicion about all of the normal incidents in the game, every dropped pass, every missed free throw if sports gambling is allowed to spread, Mishkin argued. They're our games. That gives us a personal stake, and that gives us standing.


He disputed the state's contention that fantasy sports leagues, which the pro leagues sanction, are tantamount to gambling because they dilute fans' allegiance to a specific team.





Comments
comments powered by Disqus Commenting Guidelines
Poll
Mortgage Minute


Search for New & Used Cars

Make 
Model
 
Used New All
 

Search Times Leader Classifieds to find just the home you want!

Search Times Leader Classifieds to find just what you need!

Search Pet Classifieds
Dogs Cats Other Animals



Social Media/RSS
Times Leader on Twitter
Times Leader on Youtube
Times Leader on Google+
The Times Leader on Tumblr
The Times Leader on Pinterest
Times Leader RSS Feeds