Saturday, May 18, 2013





Taxpayers lose as sports partners


Last Modified: February 19. 2013 4:41PM
Story Tools
PrintPrint | E-MailEMail | SaveSave | Hear Generate QR Code QR
Send to Kindle


A NEW BOOK by a Harvard University professor not only confirms that taxpayers lose when they subsidize construction of facilities for pro sports teams – it shows those deals are even worse for taxpayers than they thought.


In Public/Private Partnerships for Major League Sports Facilities, urban planning associate professor Judith Grant Long analyzes such deals for 121 sports facilities in use during 2010 – adding up the costs of land, infrastructure, lost property-tax revenue and operations, then subtracting revenue and rent that the facilities generate. She finds those costs hike taxpayers' bills an average of 25 percent, Bloomberg News reports.


That raises taxpayers' average cost per facility from the $170 million commonly cited by teams and media to $259 million – about $10 billion more overall. And on average, taxpayers bear 78 percent of construction costs, teams just 22 percent.


Contrary to popular perception, these partnerships are in fact highly uneven, Long writes.


Pittsburgh Tribune-Review Greensburg




Comments
Commenting Guidelines
Poll

Search for New & Used Cars

Make 
Model
 
Used New All
 

Search Times Leader Classifieds to find just the home you want!

Search Times Leader Classifieds to find just what you need!

Search Pet Classifieds
Dogs Cats Other Animals



Social Media/RSS
Times Leader on Twitter
Times Leader on Youtube
Times Leader on Google+
The Times Leader on Tumblr
The Times Leader on Pinterest
Times Leader RSS Feeds